digitalmars.d.dwt
February 7th, 2006 | by Aldacron |As part of Walter’s plan of world domination, DWT now has a Digital Mars newsgroup to reflect its new found status as the ‘official’ D GUI library. The new group can be found at digitalmars.d.dwt.
News and Opinions of the Digital Mars D Programming Language
As part of Walter’s plan of world domination, DWT now has a Digital Mars newsgroup to reflect its new found status as the ‘official’ D GUI library. The new group can be found at digitalmars.d.dwt.
By Anonymous on Feb 7, 2006
while DWT is clearly more complete, lets not forget DFL, which IMO offers a cleaner API. Your previous post even mentioned a really cool tool that will make me question whether I want to actually use DWT. Especially for quick GUI apps, I would prefer DFL + Entice.
Chris L.
By Aldacron on Feb 7, 2006
I’ve nothing against DFL. But Walter decided that DWT is the package he wanted to put Digital Mars behind. His reasoning was laid out in a recent NG post in digitalmars.d.
By Clay Smith on Feb 9, 2006
This post has been removed by the author.
By Clay Smith on Feb 9, 2006
just stopped by to say hello, and while I’m at it, I don’t think it matters which GUI Walter chooses, as long as he chooses one and sticks with it.
Anyways, if DWT’s API is not that clean someone can always write a wrapper on it / GUIBuilder type tool.
Oh and by the way nice site!
By Hengky H on Jul 24, 2007
If DWT is always up to date with the latest D version like DFL, maybe i’ll choose DWT.
But the weakness of DWT is hard to find the documentation to use it. I have to explore Eclipse website to find out about SWT.
D + DFL + Entice like using Visual Basic. When i show Entice to my friend that never hear b4 about D programming language, he said that the GUI and DFL code like in Visual Basic code, and not like the C code. Few my other friends say almost the same..
DFL + Entice is cool..