<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q &amp; A: Gregor Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/</link>
	<description>News and Opinions Regarding the D Programming Language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aldacron</title>
		<link>http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldacron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>I briefly considered that. But the reason I don&#039;t clip them, and never have, is because I find it annoying myself when feeds to which I subscribe do so. I prefer to read the entire post in my feed reader. I know bloggers and blog readers have mixed opinions on this, though.

Now that planet has come along, it changes the landscape a bit. But I don&#039;t want to clip my entire feed just for planet. I don&#039;t mind so much if I lose a bit of traffic as a result. As for taking up space, most of my posts are quite short. Only the Q&amp;As are long.

Now, if there were a way to just clip the feed for planet only, that would be a worthwhile option. Then again, for the Q&amp;As, I guess I could also just add a &#039;more&#039; tag to the post itself. That would clip it in the feed as well, right? I&#039;ll try it with an edit and see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I briefly considered that. But the reason I don&#8217;t clip them, and never have, is because I find it annoying myself when feeds to which I subscribe do so. I prefer to read the entire post in my feed reader. I know bloggers and blog readers have mixed opinions on this, though.</p>
<p>Now that planet has come along, it changes the landscape a bit. But I don&#8217;t want to clip my entire feed just for planet. I don&#8217;t mind so much if I lose a bit of traffic as a result. As for taking up space, most of my posts are quite short. Only the Q&#038;As are long.</p>
<p>Now, if there were a way to just clip the feed for planet only, that would be a worthwhile option. Then again, for the Q&#038;As, I guess I could also just add a &#8216;more&#8217; tag to the post itself. That would clip it in the feed as well, right? I&#8217;ll try it with an edit and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/comment-page-1/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dblog.aldacron.net/2007/08/27/q-a-gregor-richards/#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>OT: miller[] suggests that you make the RSS feed clip your posts, so they A) don&#039;t use up all the space on planet.d B) you don&#039;t lose traffic since people will have to click the link to this entry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT: miller[] suggests that you make the RSS feed clip your posts, so they A) don&#8217;t use up all the space on planet.d B) you don&#8217;t lose traffic since people will have to click the link to this entry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

